Skip to main content

Soviet Mainframe Computers

Ural-1 Control Unit
The world of Soviet tech is an interesting one, they frequently were forced to resort to workarounds as they attempted to compensate for their lagging technological development when compared to the West. This does not detract from their very real accomplishments in areas such as the space race, where they led the West for years before finally irrevocably falling behind after the untimely death of their leading designer, Sergei Korolev in 1966.

I recently purchased an entire book on eBay called The Technological Level of Soviet Industry, (archived 1978 review here, there is no direct link to buy it as even Amazon doesn't seem to have it). This isn't a full book, rather it is a collection of different author's papers all bound together. I purchased the book specifically to get Chapter 8, Computer technology which is an extremely good resource on the state of Soviet computing in the late 70s. At the time of publication in 1977, personal computers such as the Apple II, TRS-80, and Commodore PET were just starting to be released to the public, starting a seismic shift that wouldn't fully manifest itself for some years.

In the Soviet Union on the other hand, computer technology lagged about ten years behind America. And even this is undoubtedly being charitable as most contemporary comparisons relied on Soviet published figures, which were notorious for being unreliable indicators of the actual state of things.

Soviet computers seem to start off in the early 1950s, some years after the West. At this point they were already lagging behind the West, a situation that only worsened as the years passed on. By 1964, if we accept Soviet figures at face value, the Soviet Union seemed to have about two percent as many computers as the United States did, and these were considerably inferior in performance and software.

BESM-6
Soviet attempts to close the gap resulted in systems such as the Ural, Minsk, and of particular significance, the BESM-6, which was the first transistor based Soviet system,  released in 1966, four years after the first comparable American system, the IBM 7094 was released commercially.

When IBM revolutionized the world with the first family of computers, the 360 series in 1964 (released commercially in 1965), the Soviets were unable to respond with their own comparable system until the ES series in the early 1970s.

The Soviet Union also made heavy use of stolen or covertly acquired computer technology, especially from IBM, to advance its own systems. Without this, they would have fallen even further behind. But ultimately, this could only get them so far. They simply could not match the rapid pace of innovation and advance that characterized the American computer industry at this time, which frequently developed new products that obsoleted the old ones. While the Soviet Union was still working on developing their own transistor based systems, the American computer companies were pushing forward with integrated circuits, obsoleting entire factories and systems, both of which were replaced at a frantic pace. 

Does any of this really matter today? Not really, it's just an interesting footnote in computing history. Sometime I plan to do a post on Soviet personal computers. They did exist in the 1980s, and were primarily copies of western personal computers like the Apple II and the Sinclair Spectrum. But they were built entirely differently in order to be manufactured by the extant Soviet technology of the day.


Credits

Ural-1 Control Unit
By Panther - Own work, CC BY-SA 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=6358233

BESM-6
By Victor R. Ruiz - https://www.flickr.com/photos/rvr/21836713154/in/photolist-zgCS3o, CC BY 2.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=70714402
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Those Violent Amish

Three men are dead in Fresno, after a man named Kori Ali Muhammad opened fire, hitting four white men in total and killing three of them. He is also suspected of the murder of a security guard this past Thursday.  A survey of his Twitter shows him using the well known Amish hate phrase " Allahu Akbar. " Not that you would know that from the AP, as they said that he was instead shouting "God is great" as he went on his murderous rampage.  True that is a rough  approximation of what the phrase means, but I am reasonably sure that everybody these days knows who is likely to be shouting that phrase as they murder the innocent.  It's the Amish of course.  Anything to further obfusticate the facts of the case and push the Narrative of Muslims(I mean Amish) as peace-loving, misunderstood individuals, not like those violent Christians who go to church on Sunday where they plot to further their terroristic reign over the world.  ABC is now ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Writing Update

So far this week I haven't gotten too much done, I've mostly been outlining. Book 1 was fully outlined in basic one sentence form, so I have been going back through the outline and tightening it up, by removing things that impede the narrative flow, and expanding the areas that help it progress.  I want to make sure that I don't have anything outlined that is just "filler" or something clearly thrown in just to pad the word count a bit, I hate it when authors do that. The goal is to get each one sentence outline expanded to a full paragraph. Then I'll do a scene breakdown, then and only then will I write the story. My hope is that this will not only keep the books feeling cohesive, but will also help me use my writing time more effectively. The outline for The Pyongyang Incursion  is twenty-one points currently, and I have expanded nine of them to a full paragraph in the last week. I also have the first three outline points done on the sequel, The Vladi...
Post a Comment
Read more

Axis and Allies 1942 Online Review

I have been enjoying Axis and Allies for almost twenty years now. I started with what is now called Axis and Allies Classic, the 1984 edition. I bought it for forty dollars (plus eight dollars shipping and handling) when I was about twelve. I had played the game at a neighbor's house, and absolutely fell in love with it, obsessing over it and mentally playing and replaying games in my head, trying to understand its ins and outs. I read the strategy guide, looked for opportunities to try new strategies, and even built a custom table for the game, something that barely fit into the cramped room my brother and I shared. I never became an expert in A&A, at best I am a fairly good casual player and the nice thing about A&A is that you don't have to be a massive board game nerd to enjoy it. The rules are complex, but the basics are easy to grasp. Once I went off to college, it was years before I played another A&A game, and in that time there had been a couple rev...
Post a Comment
Read more