Skip to main content

Soviet Mainframe Computers

Ural-1 Control Unit
The world of Soviet tech is an interesting one, they frequently were forced to resort to workarounds as they attempted to compensate for their lagging technological development when compared to the West. This does not detract from their very real accomplishments in areas such as the space race, where they led the West for years before finally irrevocably falling behind after the untimely death of their leading designer, Sergei Korolev in 1966.

I recently purchased an entire book on eBay called The Technological Level of Soviet Industry, (archived 1978 review here, there is no direct link to buy it as even Amazon doesn't seem to have it). This isn't a full book, rather it is a collection of different author's papers all bound together. I purchased the book specifically to get Chapter 8, Computer technology which is an extremely good resource on the state of Soviet computing in the late 70s. At the time of publication in 1977, personal computers such as the Apple II, TRS-80, and Commodore PET were just starting to be released to the public, starting a seismic shift that wouldn't fully manifest itself for some years.

In the Soviet Union on the other hand, computer technology lagged about ten years behind America. And even this is undoubtedly being charitable as most contemporary comparisons relied on Soviet published figures, which were notorious for being unreliable indicators of the actual state of things.

Soviet computers seem to start off in the early 1950s, some years after the West. At this point they were already lagging behind the West, a situation that only worsened as the years passed on. By 1964, if we accept Soviet figures at face value, the Soviet Union seemed to have about two percent as many computers as the United States did, and these were considerably inferior in performance and software.

BESM-6
Soviet attempts to close the gap resulted in systems such as the Ural, Minsk, and of particular significance, the BESM-6, which was the first transistor based Soviet system,  released in 1966, four years after the first comparable American system, the IBM 7094 was released commercially.

When IBM revolutionized the world with the first family of computers, the 360 series in 1964 (released commercially in 1965), the Soviets were unable to respond with their own comparable system until the ES series in the early 1970s.

The Soviet Union also made heavy use of stolen or covertly acquired computer technology, especially from IBM, to advance its own systems. Without this, they would have fallen even further behind. But ultimately, this could only get them so far. They simply could not match the rapid pace of innovation and advance that characterized the American computer industry at this time, which frequently developed new products that obsoleted the old ones. While the Soviet Union was still working on developing their own transistor based systems, the American computer companies were pushing forward with integrated circuits, obsoleting entire factories and systems, both of which were replaced at a frantic pace. 

Does any of this really matter today? Not really, it's just an interesting footnote in computing history. Sometime I plan to do a post on Soviet personal computers. They did exist in the 1980s, and were primarily copies of western personal computers like the Apple II and the Sinclair Spectrum. But they were built entirely differently in order to be manufactured by the extant Soviet technology of the day.


Credits

Ural-1 Control Unit
By Panther - Own work, CC BY-SA 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=6358233

BESM-6
By Victor R. Ruiz - https://www.flickr.com/photos/rvr/21836713154/in/photolist-zgCS3o, CC BY 2.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=70714402

Labels

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Lazy Inventory 0.4 Released

LAZY INVENTORY RELEASE 0.4 OVERVIEW I am proud to announce the 0.4 release of Lazy Inventory, the amazing inventory management system that nobody currently uses ;) It can be downloaded via clicking this link . In the last few months I have made quite a bit of progress on adding new features and debugging existing ones, as well as moving to a numbered release system for easier tracking. We are a long ways away from even a 1.0 release, but Lazy Inventory 0.4 now is fully capable of not only managing inventory for a small business, but also picking orders. I would say it's an even bigger jump from trying to use Google Sheets or Excel than the retroactively renamed version 0.1 was. My very basic features and bug tracking spreadsheet is shown at the right, its pretty basic but it gets the job done and keeps me on track. Currently there are forty-four features on my to-do list, a version 1.0 release will require somewhere around  thirty-five of them to be completed and polishe...
Post a Comment
Read more

Those Violent Amish

Three men are dead in Fresno, after a man named Kori Ali Muhammad opened fire, hitting four white men in total and killing three of them. He is also suspected of the murder of a security guard this past Thursday.  A survey of his Twitter shows him using the well known Amish hate phrase " Allahu Akbar. " Not that you would know that from the AP, as they said that he was instead shouting "God is great" as he went on his murderous rampage.  True that is a rough  approximation of what the phrase means, but I am reasonably sure that everybody these days knows who is likely to be shouting that phrase as they murder the innocent.  It's the Amish of course.  Anything to further obfusticate the facts of the case and push the Narrative of Muslims(I mean Amish) as peace-loving, misunderstood individuals, not like those violent Christians who go to church on Sunday where they plot to further their terroristic reign over the world.  ABC is now ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Commifornia Gun Control

The Truth About Guns ran an article earlier today on the efforts of Illinois Democrats to create an Orwellian gun registry with mandated compliance. For the children of course. This totalitarianism is of course shared by most Democrats across the nation, they just can afford to be far more open about it from inside of the handful of states that they control from top to bottom. The article referenced similar laws currently afflicting Californians and made the following statement that really shows the trenchant totalitarianism of the California Democratic Party and the problems that occur for the law-abiding citizens who have the misfortune to be under them. . California’s new laws give gun owners three choices on what to do with their freshly outlawed self-defense tools. They can surrender their guns – without compensation – to police. Alternately, they can sell them to a dealer or ship them out of state. The Golden State’s too-smart-by-half legislature seems to disco...
Post a Comment
Read more