Skip to main content

Soviet Mainframe Computers

Ural-1 Control Unit
The world of Soviet tech is an interesting one, they frequently were forced to resort to workarounds as they attempted to compensate for their lagging technological development when compared to the West. This does not detract from their very real accomplishments in areas such as the space race, where they led the West for years before finally irrevocably falling behind after the untimely death of their leading designer, Sergei Korolev in 1966.

I recently purchased an entire book on eBay called The Technological Level of Soviet Industry, (archived 1978 review here, there is no direct link to buy it as even Amazon doesn't seem to have it). This isn't a full book, rather it is a collection of different author's papers all bound together. I purchased the book specifically to get Chapter 8, Computer technology which is an extremely good resource on the state of Soviet computing in the late 70s. At the time of publication in 1977, personal computers such as the Apple II, TRS-80, and Commodore PET were just starting to be released to the public, starting a seismic shift that wouldn't fully manifest itself for some years.

In the Soviet Union on the other hand, computer technology lagged about ten years behind America. And even this is undoubtedly being charitable as most contemporary comparisons relied on Soviet published figures, which were notorious for being unreliable indicators of the actual state of things.

Soviet computers seem to start off in the early 1950s, some years after the West. At this point they were already lagging behind the West, a situation that only worsened as the years passed on. By 1964, if we accept Soviet figures at face value, the Soviet Union seemed to have about two percent as many computers as the United States did, and these were considerably inferior in performance and software.

BESM-6
Soviet attempts to close the gap resulted in systems such as the Ural, Minsk, and of particular significance, the BESM-6, which was the first transistor based Soviet system,  released in 1966, four years after the first comparable American system, the IBM 7094 was released commercially.

When IBM revolutionized the world with the first family of computers, the 360 series in 1964 (released commercially in 1965), the Soviets were unable to respond with their own comparable system until the ES series in the early 1970s.

The Soviet Union also made heavy use of stolen or covertly acquired computer technology, especially from IBM, to advance its own systems. Without this, they would have fallen even further behind. But ultimately, this could only get them so far. They simply could not match the rapid pace of innovation and advance that characterized the American computer industry at this time, which frequently developed new products that obsoleted the old ones. While the Soviet Union was still working on developing their own transistor based systems, the American computer companies were pushing forward with integrated circuits, obsoleting entire factories and systems, both of which were replaced at a frantic pace. 

Does any of this really matter today? Not really, it's just an interesting footnote in computing history. Sometime I plan to do a post on Soviet personal computers. They did exist in the 1980s, and were primarily copies of western personal computers like the Apple II and the Sinclair Spectrum. But they were built entirely differently in order to be manufactured by the extant Soviet technology of the day.


Credits

Ural-1 Control Unit
By Panther - Own work, CC BY-SA 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=6358233

BESM-6
By Victor R. Ruiz - https://www.flickr.com/photos/rvr/21836713154/in/photolist-zgCS3o, CC BY 2.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=70714402
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Rise to Revolt Update

I have chosen to keep from releasing R2R on any other platform other than Kobo. Why? Because when it comes down to it, I learned so much from writing it, and feel that I developed enough as a writer from writing it, that I do not want to put it on the market in its current state. It's a good story, and I love the universe...but I am very aware of the flaws that are present in it. It still is something I am proud of because I finished it, and because I feel that the universe building in it is a strong point. I read somewhere that only about one in four people who say they intend to write a novel, actually follow through and finish something.  I have no idea how reliable a statistic that is, but anyway you look at it, it is an accomplishment to actually finish writing a book. Too many aspiring authors are always talking about the great thing that they are going to write, but never actually get around to doing it...the difficulty of actually seeing a work through to com...
Post a Comment
Read more

Writing Updates

Progress has been slow this past month, but there has been progress. Mostly what I have been doing is expanding my outline from what was sometimes just a sentence or two, fleshing each out to sometimes as much as several hundred words. Book one (The Pyongyang Incursion) has its outline completely done, although I am sure there will be further revisions to it as I work on the other two book outlines. Currently the outline stands at over 2400 words across twenty different outline points, and I am overall pretty pleased with how it's shaping up, the overall story arc is much tighter and I was able to trim some fat off some points and add other points to keep the story moving along at a good pace. Book two (The Vladivostok Penetration) has most of the summary written but only three outline points, while book three (The Berlin Infiltration) has one lonely little outline point and no summary written. The summaries for the overall series background has been expanded a little bit more,...
Post a Comment
Read more